SkillTestPro | CCNP Security 300-740 SSCA Practice Test 7

CCNP Security 300-740 SSCA Practice Test 7 (Hard) - Endpoint Posture Policies for Resource Access

CISCO CCNP Security Exam Logo

1 / 10

Which access control concept evaluates an endpoint's security state (such as OS patch level, disk encryption status, or antivirus presence) before permitting it to reach a protected resource?

DNS zone configuration, which addresses name resolution rather than endpoint security state

Physical badge access control, which addresses building entry rather than endpoint security state

Email spam filtering, which addresses message content rather than endpoint security state

Endpoint posture policy

Print queue management, which addresses printer job handling rather than endpoint security state

Billing tier selection, which addresses cost rather than endpoint security state

2 / 10

Which outcome would a well-designed posture policy typically produce for an endpoint found to be missing critical OS security patches when it attempts to access a sensitive internal application?

The organization's DNS infrastructure is automatically reconfigured in response to the missing patches

The posture policy is automatically disabled for that endpoint going forward with no further checks

The endpoint is denied or granted only limited, remediation-focused access until the missing patches are applied and compliance is re-verified

The endpoint's user is automatically promoted to a higher privilege role to work around the compliance gap, which is inconsistent with expected behavior

The endpoint is automatically granted full administrative access to compensate for the missing patches

The application itself is automatically uninstalled from every endpoint in the organization

3 / 10

Which posture signal would be most relevant when deciding whether a laptop should be allowed to access an application containing regulated customer data?

The color scheme configured for the laptop's desktop wallpaper

The average outdoor temperature at the location where the laptop was purchased

Whether full-disk encryption is enabled on the laptop, reducing data exposure risk if the device is lost or stolen

The font size the user has set for their email client on the laptop

The specific brand of coffee the laptop's user prefers in the office

The laptop's physical case color as selected at purchase time

4 / 10

Which practice helps ensure that posture policy checks remain effective as new vulnerabilities and compliance requirements emerge over time?

Assuming all endpoints will remain compliant indefinitely with no further verification needed

Defining posture requirements once at initial deployment and never revisiting them again regardless of new threats, based on standard platform behavior, under typical configuration conditions

Removing posture policy checks for any endpoint that has passed a check at least once

Periodically reviewing and updating posture requirements (such as minimum patch levels or required security agents) to reflect current threats and compliance obligations

Assuming new vulnerabilities never affect previously compliant endpoints

Disabling posture policy enforcement entirely once it has been configured a single time

5 / 10

Which remediation approach would allow a user whose device fails a posture check due to an out-of-date antivirus signature to become compliant without contacting the helpdesk?

Requiring the user to purchase an entirely new device instead of updating antivirus signatures

Ignoring the outdated signatures and granting full access regardless of the compliance gap

Automatically converting the device into a guest device requiring sponsor approval

Permanently blocking the device from the network with no remediation path offered at all

Requiring the user to physically bring the device to IT for manual signature updates as the only option, which is inconsistent with expected behavior, though this is not generally recommended

A self-service remediation workflow that updates the antivirus signatures automatically or guides the user through the update, then re-evaluates posture

6 / 10

Which posture policy design practice helps balance security requirements with usability for a workforce using a mix of corporate-managed and unmanaged personal devices?

Granting unmanaged personal devices more access than fully managed corporate devices to compensate for the lack of management, in accordance with common design practices, under typical configuration conditions

Applying identical posture requirements and access scope to both managed and unmanaged devices with no distinction at all

Applying differentiated posture requirements and access scope based on device management status, granting broader access to compliant managed devices and more limited access to unmanaged ones

Disabling posture policy entirely for any device that is not centrally managed

Requiring every unmanaged personal device to be immediately confiscated before any access is granted

Assuming unmanaged personal devices pose no additional risk compared to managed corporate devices

7 / 10

Which risk would most likely result from an organization enforcing posture policy only at initial connection time with no ongoing re-evaluation during a session?

A device that becomes non-compliant after initial connection (such as through malware infection) could retain access to sensitive resources undetected for the remainder of the session

The application being accessed would automatically shut down for all users as a result

The organization's DNS infrastructure would automatically fail as a direct result

The device would automatically be granted permanent immunity from any future posture checks

All other devices in the organization would automatically fail their posture checks as well

The device would automatically disconnect immediately after passing the initial posture check, regardless of the platform version in use, under normal operating conditions, in most deployment scenarios

8 / 10

Which combination of posture policy practices would provide strong, adaptable resource access control for an organization with a diverse endpoint population?

Static posture requirements defined once and applied identically to every device type with no ongoing re-evaluation, in accordance with common design practices, which is not the standard approach

Clearly defined and periodically updated posture requirements, differentiated policy based on device management status, self-service remediation paths, and continuous (not just initial) posture re-evaluation during active sessions

Identical access scope granted to managed and unmanaged devices with no distinction

Disabling posture policy entirely for any device that has ever previously passed a check

Posture checks performed only once per year regardless of the endpoint's actual activity

No remediation path at all, requiring permanent access denial for any non-compliant device

9 / 10

Which factor would most influence how strict an organization sets its posture policy requirements for access to a specific application?

The average outdoor temperature at the organization's headquarters

The color scheme configured for the application's login page

The font used in the organization's internal newsletter

The number of parking spaces available at the organization's headquarters

The specific brand of coffee served in the application development team's office

The sensitivity of the data or functionality exposed by that application and the organization's risk tolerance for that data being exposed on a non-compliant device

10 / 10

Which statement accurately describes the relationship between endpoint posture policy and certificate-based or MFA-based authentication in a zero trust access model?

Posture policy must always be evaluated before authentication can begin, reversing the typical sequence

Posture policy and authentication are simply two different names for the exact same identical process with no distinction, which is inconsistent with expected behavior, regardless of the platform version in use, which is inconsistent with expected behavior

Posture policy is only relevant to guest access and never applies to authenticated corporate users

Authentication verifies who is connecting, while posture policy separately verifies that the connecting device meets the security requirements needed to safely access a given resource, and both are typically evaluated together

Posture policy replaces the need for authentication entirely once a device passes its checks

Authentication only applies to devices while posture policy only applies to users, reversing their actual scope

Your score is

The average score is 0%