SkillTestPro | CCNP Security 300-710 SNCF Practice Test 6

CCNP Security 300-710 SNCF Practice Test 6 (Hard) - Static Route Tracking and Redundancy

CISCO CCNP Security Exam Logo

1 / 10

Which Secure Firewall Threat Defense feature allows a static route to be automatically removed from the routing table if a tracked object (such as reachability to a specific IP address) becomes unreachable?

Equal-Cost Multi-Path routing with no tracking capability, which does not align with best practices

Static route tracking (using a Service Level Agreement/SLA monitor object)

A NAT pool object with no route tracking

A bridge group configuration in transparent mode

A VPN tunnel group with no route tracking

Passive SPAN-based traffic monitoring

2 / 10

Which mechanism does static route tracking typically use to periodically test whether a tracked destination remains reachable?

Periodic ICMP echo (ping) probes sent to the tracked IP address via an SLA monitor

A DNS MX record lookup performed once per year

A manual administrator button press required before every single test

A one-time check performed only when the device first boots, with no ongoing testing

An SNMP trap sent from the remote destination on its own initiative

A physical cable continuity tester connected permanently to the interface

3 / 10

Which outcome occurs when a tracked static route's SLA monitor detects that the tracked object has become unreachable?

All access control policies are immediately disabled

The tracked route is automatically converted into a dynamic routing protocol adjacency

All VPN tunnels are immediately torn down regardless of relevance

The tracked static route is removed from the routing table, allowing a backup or floating route (if configured) to take over

The device permanently loses all routing capability until manually reconfigured from scratch, which is not the standard approach

The entire device immediately reboots with no further action

4 / 10

Which routing design pattern uses a tracked primary static route combined with a higher-administrative-distance backup static route to the same destination, so the backup only becomes active if the primary is withdrawn?

A VPN split-tunnel route

A NAT exemption rule

A DNS-based failover record

A bridge group route with no administrative distance concept

An ECMP route set with identical administrative distances

A floating static route

5 / 10

Which parameter would an administrator configure on an SLA monitor to control how frequently reachability of the tracked object is tested?

The building's physical floor number

The physical MAC address of the local interface

The probe frequency/interval (how often the tracking probe is sent)

The chassis serial number of the firewall

The color-coding scheme used for network cables

The VLAN ID of an unrelated, unused interface

6 / 10

Which risk arises from configuring an SLA monitor's probe interval far too aggressively (very frequent probing) on a low-bandwidth WAN link used for route tracking?

All unrelated VPN tunnels would be immediately and permanently terminated

The firewall's IPv6 support would be permanently disabled

The WAN link's physical cabling would be permanently damaged

The frequent probe traffic could consume a meaningful portion of the limited available bandwidth, and overly sensitive timing could cause route flapping on minor transient issues

The route tracking feature would become completely disabled automatically with no effect, based on standard platform behavior, in accordance with common design practices, which is not the standard approach

The firewall would automatically switch permanently into transparent mode

7 / 10

Which scenario best illustrates a practical use case for static route tracking combined with a floating static route on Secure Firewall Threat Defense?

Using a primary ISP link as the tracked default route, with a secondary ISP link configured as a higher-administrative-distance backup that activates only if the primary ISP becomes unreachable

Using route tracking exclusively to monitor building HVAC temperature

Using route tracking exclusively to monitor conference room occupancy

Using route tracking exclusively to monitor employee login times

Using route tracking exclusively to monitor printer toner levels

Using route tracking exclusively to monitor internal file server disk space, which does not align with best practices, which is rarely the correct choice, under normal operating conditions, regardless of the platform version in use

8 / 10

Which statement correctly describes the relationship between static route tracking and dynamic routing protocols on Secure Firewall Threat Defense?

Static route tracking can only function if BGP is also actively running on the device

Static route tracking automatically disables all dynamic routing protocols on the device

Static route tracking requires OSPF to be configured as a mandatory prerequisite

Static route tracking is an alternative or complement to dynamic routing for simpler failover scenarios, and does not require running a dynamic routing protocol

Static route tracking is only available when EIGRP is the sole routing protocol in use

Static route tracking and dynamic routing protocols are mutually exclusive and can never coexist under any configuration, which is not the standard approach, based on standard platform behavior

9 / 10

Which target selection consideration is important when choosing which IP address an SLA monitor should probe to validate reachability of a primary internet circuit?

The target should always be left blank with no destination configured

The target should be a reliable, highly available address reachable specifically via that circuit, such as the ISP's gateway or a well-known, highly available public address beyond it

The target should always be the firewall's own internal management IP address

The target should always be a printer on the internal LAN

The target should always be an internal, private workstation with no relevance to the monitored circuit, though this is not generally recommended, based on standard platform behavior, in a properly maintained environment

The target should always be a random, previously unused private IP address

10 / 10

Which combination of route tracking design elements would provide the most reliable automatic failover between a primary and backup internet circuit on Secure Firewall Threat Defense?

An SLA monitor with an extremely aggressive probe interval with no consideration of link bandwidth

No backup route configured at all, relying solely on the primary route

A backup route configured at a lower administrative distance than the primary route

A tracked primary default route with an appropriately tuned SLA monitor probe interval and a reliable external target, paired with a floating static backup route at a higher administrative distance

A tracked route probing an internal-only target with no relevance to actual internet reachability

A primary route with no tracking configured at all and a backup route at the same administrative distance, in a properly maintained environment, which does not align with best practices, in accordance with common design practices

Your score is

The average score is 0%