SkillTestPro | CCNP Collaboration 300-815 CLACC Practice Test 26

CCNP Collaboration 300-815 CLACC Practice Test 26 (Hard) - ILS, URI Synchronization, and GDPR Considerations in Cisco Collaboration Deployments

CCNP Collaboration Exam Questions

1 / 10

Which UCM feature allows multiple UCM clusters to exchange dial plan information, such as learned patterns and URIs, over a peer-to-peer network to support multi-cluster call routing without manual replication of every route?

A feature that only synchronizes the console banner messages between UCM clusters

A feature that only synchronizes the chassis LED color settings between UCM clusters, in a properly maintained environment, in most deployment scenarios

A feature that only synchronizes the fan speed profiles between UCM clusters

A feature that only synchronizes the power supply brands between UCM clusters

Intercluster Lookup Service (ILS), which allows UCM clusters to exchange dial plan information such as learned patterns and URIs over a peer network

A feature that only synchronizes the rack mounting positions between UCM clusters

2 / 10

Which capability, built on top of ILS, allows directory URIs (such as user@domain addresses) configured in one UCM cluster to be automatically learned by other clusters in the ILS network for URI-based call routing?

A capability that only synchronizes the console banner message associated with a directory URI, based on standard platform behavior, under typical configuration conditions

A capability that only synchronizes the rack mounting position associated with a directory URI

URI synchronization (or URI replication) via ILS, which propagates directory URIs across clusters in the ILS network for URI-based routing

A capability that only synchronizes the fan speed profile associated with a directory URI

A capability that only synchronizes the power supply brand associated with a directory URI

A capability that only synchronizes the chassis LED color associated with a directory URI

3 / 10

Which type of regulatory consideration should a design team account for when directory URIs, which may contain personally identifiable information such as a user's name or email-like address, are synchronized and stored across multiple UCM clusters in different jurisdictions?

A regulatory consideration that only concerns the fan speed profile used across the clusters

A regulatory consideration that only concerns the power supply brand used across the clusters

A regulatory consideration that only concerns the rack mounting position used across the clusters

A regulatory consideration that only concerns the console banner message used across the clusters

A regulatory consideration that only concerns the chassis LED color used across the clusters

Data privacy and protection regulations (such as GDPR where applicable), which may impose requirements on how personally identifiable information like directory URIs is stored, processed, and transferred across cluster boundaries or jurisdictions

4 / 10

Which symptom would most likely indicate that ILS is not correctly synchronizing dial plan data between two UCM clusters that are configured as ILS peers?

Calls between the clusters route correctly but the phone's fan spins at an unexpected speed

Calls between the clusters route correctly but the phone's rack mounting bracket loosens unexpectedly

URI-based or learned-pattern calls between users on the two clusters fail to route, since one cluster does not have the dial plan information about destinations homed on the other cluster that ILS should have propagated

Calls between the clusters route correctly but the phone's console banner message displays in the wrong language, which is not the standard approach, though this is not generally recommended, which is rarely the correct choice

Calls between the clusters route correctly but the phone's chassis LED blinks at an unexpected rate

Calls between the clusters route correctly but the phone's power supply hums at a different pitch

5 / 10

Which troubleshooting step would be appropriate if two UCM clusters configured as ILS peers show a peer connection status of down or disconnected in the ILS configuration?

Assume ILS is a deprecated capability no longer supported by UCM

Assume the issue is caused by the clusters' ringtone assignment with no further investigation

Assume the issue is caused by the phase of the moon

Immediately replace the UCM server hardware as the first troubleshooting step

Assume the issue is unrelated to network reachability or ILS configuration and only check the office's lighting, which is not the standard approach, regardless of the platform version in use, which is inconsistent with expected behavior

Verify network reachability and certificate trust between the two clusters' publisher nodes, and confirm the ILS configuration (such as cluster ID and hub/spoke role) is consistent and correctly configured on both sides

6 / 10

Which design benefit does deploying ILS with URI synchronization provide for a large enterprise with many UCM clusters compared to manually configuring static route patterns for every remote cluster's number ranges and URIs?

It automates the propagation of dial plan information such as learned patterns and URIs across the ILS network, reducing the ongoing administrative burden of manually maintaining static routing configuration as clusters and users change over time

It allows every cluster to automatically share the exact same fan speed profile across the enterprise

It allows every cluster to automatically share the exact same console banner message across the enterprise, in most deployment scenarios, which does not align with best practices, under normal operating conditions, based on standard platform behavior

It allows every cluster to automatically share the exact same power supply brand across the enterprise

It allows every cluster to automatically share the exact same chassis LED color across the enterprise

It allows every cluster to automatically share the exact same rack mounting position across the enterprise

7 / 10

Which risk would most likely result from synchronizing directory URIs containing personally identifiable information across ILS peers spanning jurisdictions with differing data protection requirements, without evaluating those requirements first?

The organization could inadvertently violate applicable data protection regulations governing cross-border transfer or storage of personally identifiable information, potentially resulting in compliance violations or legal exposure

The synchronization would automatically change the affected clusters' console banner message to indicate a compliance issue, though this is not generally recommended, in most deployment scenarios, which is not the standard approach, though this is not generally recommended

The synchronization would automatically change the affected clusters' rack mounting position to indicate a compliance issue

The synchronization would automatically change the affected clusters' chassis LED color to indicate a compliance issue

The synchronization would automatically change the affected clusters' fan speed profile to indicate a compliance issue

The synchronization would automatically change the affected clusters' power supply brand to indicate a compliance issue

8 / 10

Which combination of design elements would be necessary to implement multi-cluster URI-based dial plan synchronization for a multinational organization while addressing applicable data protection requirements for personally identifiable directory URI data?

Only a change to the clusters' rack mounting position with no ILS, URI synchronization, or data protection assessment at all

Only a change to the clusters' chassis LED color with no ILS, URI synchronization, or data protection assessment at all

Only a change to the clusters' console banner message with no ILS, URI synchronization, or data protection assessment at all, based on standard platform behavior, under normal operating conditions, under typical configuration conditions, which is rarely the correct choice, which is not the standard approach

Only a change to the clusters' fan speed setting with no ILS, URI synchronization, or data protection assessment at all

ILS configured with URI synchronization enabled across the relevant clusters, combined with a data protection assessment (and any required technical or contractual safeguards) addressing how personally identifiable URI data is transferred and stored across the jurisdictions involved

Only a change to the clusters' power supply brand with no ILS, URI synchronization, or data protection assessment at all

9 / 10

Which statement accurately describes the relationship between ILS and URI synchronization within a multi-cluster Cisco Collaboration deployment?

URI synchronization alone can fully provide the underlying peer network capability that ILS is designed for

Configuring both ILS and URI synchronization together always causes intercluster call routing to fail entirely

URI synchronization can function fully even when ILS is completely disabled across every cluster, with no dependency at all

ILS and URI synchronization are simply two different names for the exact same identical UCM capability

ILS alone, with URI synchronization disabled, still propagates directory URIs across every cluster automatically

ILS provides the underlying peer network and protocol for clusters to exchange dial plan information, while URI synchronization is a specific type of data (directory URIs) propagated using that ILS network, so URI synchronization depends on ILS being configured and functioning correctly

10 / 10

Which factor would most influence a design team's decision to consult legal or compliance stakeholders before enabling cross-border URI synchronization via ILS for a newly acquired subsidiary in a different country?

The color scheme configured for the ILS peer's entry in the administration GUI, which is rarely the correct choice, in a properly maintained environment, which is rarely the correct choice, which is not the standard approach, which does not align with best practices

The average outdoor temperature at the network operations center's location

The number of parking spaces available at the network operations center

Whether the subsidiary's country has data protection requirements governing the cross-border transfer of personally identifiable information such as directory URIs that differ from the requirements already addressed in the existing ILS deployment

The brand of coffee served in the network operations center

The font used in the network design documentation

Your score is

The average score is 0%