CCNP Collaboration 300-815 CLACC Practice Test 16

CCNP Collaboration 300-815 CLACC Practice Test 16 (Hard) - Troubleshooting Globalized Call Routing in Cisco UCM - Route Patterns, Route Groups, and Route Lists

CCNP Collaboration Exam Questions

1 / 10

Which UCM configuration object defines a digit pattern that, when matched by a dialed number, determines which route list should be used to route the call out of the cluster?

2 / 10

Which UCM configuration object contains an ordered list of route groups, used to determine the priority order in which trunks or gateways are attempted for an outbound call?

3 / 10

Which UCM configuration object groups one or more trunks or gateways together, typically of similar type or capability, to be referenced as a single unit within a route list?

4 / 10

Which symptom would most likely indicate that a route pattern is correctly matching dialed digits, but the associated route list's route group members are all unavailable or out of service?

5 / 10

Which troubleshooting step would be appropriate if calls to a specific area code consistently fail to route, while calls to other area codes using the same route list succeed?

6 / 10

Which design benefit does using a route group to abstract a set of trunks provide when a route list needs to reference those trunks for multiple different route patterns across the dial plan?

7 / 10

Which risk would most likely result from configuring two overlapping route patterns with the same digit pattern length and specificity, each pointing to a different route list?

8 / 10

Which combination of configuration elements would be necessary to implement outbound PSTN routing with a primary SIP trunk and a backup PRI gateway, where calls automatically fail over to the backup if the primary is unavailable?

9 / 10

Which statement accurately describes the hierarchical relationship between route patterns, route lists, and route groups in UCM call routing?

10 / 10

Which factor would most influence a design team's decision to create additional route groups rather than adding more trunks directly to an existing route group for a growing multi-site deployment?

Your score is

The average score is 0%

0%