Correct Answer: Mapping each system's data types, business functions, and operating jurisdictions to the specific applicable frameworks, addressing both technical and non-technical (documentation, reporting, process) obligations, and reassessing applicability as the organization's operations or the regulatory landscape changes
Explanation: Framework mapping by data/function/jurisdiction, addressing both technical and non-technical obligations, and ongoing reassessment together provide effective alignment, unlike assuming one generic framework applies everywhere, addressing only technical requirements, one-time mapping with no reassessment, assuming home-jurisdiction compliance covers all others, or selecting frameworks at random.
Correct Answer: Mapping each system's data types, business functions, and operating jurisdictions to the specific applicable frameworks, addressing both technical and non-technical (documentation, reporting, process) obligations, and reassessing applicability as the organization's operations or the regulatory landscape changes
Explanation: Framework mapping by data/function/jurisdiction, addressing both technical and non-technical obligations, and ongoing reassessment together provide effective alignment, unlike assuming one generic framework applies everywhere, addressing only technical requirements, one-time mapping with no reassessment, assuming home-jurisdiction compliance covers all others, or selecting frameworks at random.